As the Trump campaign intensifies its attacks on Vice President Kamala Harris’s presidential aspirations, Kimberly Guilfoyle, fiancée of Donald Trump Jr. and a prominent figure in the Trump camp, has been particularly aggressive. Guilfoyle has been flooding media outlets and social platforms with harsh critiques, labeling Harris as a “fraud on every level,” a “DEI hire,” and a failed prosecutor who “supports anarchy, literally.”
Guilfoyle’s disdain for Harris isn’t solely rooted in their political opposition but also stems from a long-standing grudge dating back to their time at the San Francisco District Attorney’s Office. This animosity, which has recently been reignited, can be traced back to the early 2000s when Guilfoyle, then a local prosecutor, accused Harris, who was an assistant district attorney at the time, of trying to prevent her from returning to her previous job with the DA’s office.
The discord between the two women became public in a 2003 column in the San Francisco Chronicle titled “Brains, brio, beauty – and wounded feelings.” In the column, Guilfoyle accused Harris of treating her in a “frosty and underhanded” manner. “The bottom line is she didn’t want me there,” Guilfoyle stated. This sentiment was echoed by those who knew them during their tenure at the DA’s office in 2000 when Guilfoyle was dating future husband Gavin Newsom, then a city supervisor.
With Harris now seeking the highest office in the nation, Guilfoyle has revived this old rivalry, intensifying her attacks. Her early critiques of Harris, although harsh, are mild compared to her current rhetoric. Guilfoyle’s Instagram account is replete with posts denouncing Harris, including one where she echoes former President Donald Trump’s controversial statement that Harris “became black” only later in life.
The 2003 Chronicle column detailed Guilfoyle’s lingering resentment from a perceived slight three years prior when she was attempting to move back to San Francisco from Los Angeles to be with Newsom. Guilfoyle believed that Harris, who was then an assistant district attorney, played a role in hindering her return to the DA’s office. “You have to understand, I came with an excellent resume, and talented women should support other talented women,” Guilfoyle remarked to the paper at the time. Despite her grievances, she did manage to offer some praise for Harris, who was then running for San Francisco DA.
Fast forward to today, and the bitterness seems to have only deepened. Guilfoyle’s recent comments have been relentless, portraying Harris in an extremely negative light. This personal vendetta, now intertwined with political stakes, adds a complex layer to the Trump campaign’s strategy against Harris. The ongoing feud between Guilfoyle and Harris, rooted in their professional past, has found new life on the national political stage, with Guilfoyle leveraging her platform to amplify her criticisms.
Guilfoyle’s relentless attacks underscore a deeply personal element to the political battle, one that dates back decades but has been reignited by Harris’s current political ambitions. The old grievances have resurfaced in a more intense and public manner, reflecting the heightened stakes of a presidential campaign. This personal animosity between Guilfoyle and Harris serves as a backdrop to the broader political clash, highlighting how personal histories and grudges can influence contemporary political dynamics.
In summary, Kimberly Guilfoyle’s aggressive stance against Kamala Harris is not merely a product of their political differences but is deeply rooted in a personal feud that dates back to their time working together in San Francisco. This longstanding grudge has been reignited with Harris’s bid for the presidency, providing Guilfoyle with ample material for her attacks. As the campaign progresses, this personal vendetta is likely to continue playing a significant role in the Trump team’s strategy against Harris.
