BREAKING: INTERNATIONAL PICKLEBALL FERERATION ABOLISHES THE CONTROVERSIAL THIRD DROP DRILL.

In a significant move, the International Pickleball Federation (IPF) has decided to eliminate the third shot drop drill, a key training technique used in competitive pickleball. This announcement, made during the IPF’s annual meeting in October 2024, has stirred the pickleball community, sparking widespread debate among players, coaches, and fans.

The third shot drop is a soft, strategic shot typically played after the serve and return, designed to slow the game and allow players to approach the non-volley zone (or “kitchen”) for more controlled play. The shot has been central to competitive pickleball strategy, helping players transition from defense to offense. Consequently, the drill used to perfect this shot has been a cornerstone of training, helping players at all levels develop precision, touch, and consistency. The decision to abolish it has raised questions as to why the IPF would eliminate such a fundamental part of the game.

The rationale behind the move, as explained by IPF President Maria Sanchez, is to foster a more dynamic and varied style of play, particularly at higher levels. Sanchez noted that the third shot drop has become overemphasized in recent years, limiting the diversity of strategies employed by top players. “The third shot drop is valuable, but we’ve noticed it has overshadowed other aspects of gameplay, especially in elite competitions,” Sanchez stated. The IPF hopes that by removing this drill, players will be encouraged to diversify their tactics and rely on a broader skill set rather than defaulting to this singular technique.

The IPF also expressed concerns over the physical toll the drill might have on players. The repetitive nature of practicing the third shot drop has been linked to potential overuse injuries, particularly affecting the wrists and shoulders, due to the precision required. Medical experts within the pickleball community have echoed these concerns, further justifying the IPF’s decision.

Reactions to the decision have been mixed. Some coaches have embraced the change, seeing it as an opportunity for players to become more creative and adaptive on the court. However, many players, especially those whose games revolve around the third shot drop, have expressed frustration, viewing the change as a step backward. Despite the controversy, the IPF remains confident that this decision will lead to a more unpredictable and engaging style of play.